The problem
A solid insulating sphere of radius R carries a total charge +Q, spread uniformly through its volume.
(a) Find the electric field at a distance r > R from the centre.
(b) Find the field at r < R.
(c) Sketch E as a function of r.
(d) For Q = 4.0 nC and R = 5.0 cm, calculate E at 2.5 cm, 5.0 cm and 10 cm.
(e) The sphere is now placed at the centre of a neutral, conducting spherical shell with inner radius 2R and outer radius 3R. Find the charge on each surface of the shell and the field in every region.
Step 1: Choose the Gaussian surface
Gauss's law is true for any closed surface:
It is only useful, though, when we can pull E out of the integral. That needs a surface where:
- E has the same magnitude at every point, and
- E is parallel to dA (perpendicular to the surface) everywhere.
The charge is spherically symmetric, so the field must point radially, and its size can depend only on r. A concentric sphere of radius r meets both conditions. On that sphere:
This left-hand side is the same in every part. The only thing that changes from part to part is Qenc.
Part (a): Outside the sphere (r > R)
The Gaussian sphere encloses all of the charge, so Qenc = Q:
Part (b): Inside the sphere (r < R)
Now the Gaussian sphere encloses only part of the charge. Because the charge is uniform, use the volume charge density:
The charge enclosed is ρ times the volume of the Gaussian sphere:
Put this into Gauss's law:
Check: at r = R both answers give kQ/R². The field is continuous at the surface, as it should be for a volume charge with no surface layer.
Part (c): Graph of E(r)
Part (d): Put in numbers
With Q = 4.0 × 10⁻⁹ C, R = 0.050 m and k = 8.99 × 10⁹ N·m²/C²:
Notice the pattern: halfway in (r = R/2), E is half its surface value, because it's linear. Twice as far out (r = 2R), E is a quarter of it, because it's inverse-square.
Part (e): Add a neutral conducting shell
Now surround the sphere with a neutral conducting shell, with inner radius 2R and outer radius 3R. Work through it region by region, always with a concentric Gaussian sphere.
Inside the metal (2R < r < 3R)
In electrostatic equilibrium, E = 0 inside a conductor. So a Gaussian sphere drawn inside the metal must enclose zero net charge:
The shell is neutral overall, so whatever isn't on the inner surface must be on the outer one:
The field in every region
- r < R: E = kQr/R³. The shell doesn't change Qenc here.
- R < r < 2R (the gap): E = kQ/r².
- 2R < r < 3R (in the metal): E = 0.
- r > 3R: Qenc = Q − Q + Q = Q, so E = kQ/r² again.
Try it yourself: numbers for part (e)
Using Q = 4.0 nC and R = 5.0 cm, find E at r = 7.5 cm, 12 cm and 20 cm. Then open the answers.
r = 7.5 cm (gap): E = kQ/r² ≈ 6.4 × 10³ N/C
r = 12 cm (in the metal): E = 0
r = 20 cm (outside): E = kQ/r² ≈ 9.0 × 10² N/C
Common mistakes
- Using Q instead of Qenc inside the sphere. Only the charge inside your Gaussian surface counts.
- Confusing an insulator with a conductor. A charged conducting sphere has E = 0 inside, because all its charge is on the surface. A uniformly charged insulating sphere has E ∝ r inside.
- Using r in place of R (or the reverse) in ρ. The density uses the sphere's radius R; the enclosed volume uses the Gaussian radius r.
- Thinking the shell "blocks" the field. Outside a neutral shell the field is unchanged. Only grounding the shell would remove it.
See it move: open the Gauss's Law Explorer and choose "Uniformly charged solid sphere", then "Point charge inside a neutral conducting shell". Drag r and watch Qenc and the E(r) graph change.